SET PIECE ANALYSIS: MANCHESTER UNITED’S ATTACKING CORNERS IN THE CHAMPIONS LEAGUE 21/22

Manchester United. There has been plenty of buzz around that club lately and let’s be honest, there’s always stuff going on in the red side of Manchester. I’m not writing this piece in the light of OGS leaving or Ralf Rangnick coming to the club, but I wanted to have a look at what Manchester United does with their attacking corners in the Champions League.

A club like Manchester United is expected to be dominant on the ball, but in reality – some clubs are better and will be more dominant. This can especially be seen in some Champions League fixtures. Winning a corner and converting it into a goal is something huge in those games, and set piece can have a big impact in these high-profile matches. So, what does Manchester United do with their routines to maximise their results?

In this article I will first have a look at the data and draw a few conclusions from there, then I will look to the placement of the first contact of the corner, followed by the second contact, and then I will provide video analysis. This video analysis will look at the corner routines used and what is being done in the second phase of that particular corner.

Data and video come from InStat and Wyscout, and are collected on Monday, November 29th, 2021.

Data

Data is a wonderful tool to support what you see with your eye, but first we need to contextualise and define the data. We are working with two different data providers who give two different ideas of what a corner entails and how long a corner clip is. So if we look at what Wyscout provides, we see 20 attacking corners in the 5 Champions League games played so far and if we look at Instat we see 26 attacking corners in those same games. After having a look at them, I made the decision to look at the 20 corners and figure out the routine, as some corners have been counted twice in the InStat database due to extensive second phases.

If we look at the actual data we can see that 11% of the attacking corners have gone to the goalkeeper zone in the middle, the zon where the keeper is dominant or should be dominant. 24% of the attacking corners goes to the near post zone, which is 21% from the left side and 3% of the right side. 3% of the attacking corners goes the far post zone and this is only when corners are taken from the right side, from the left side none of the corners went to the far post zone. 18% of the attacking corners goes to the 11-meter zone, 11% from the left side and 7% of the right side.

First contact

In the image above you can see the first contacts from corners taken from the left. There were 13 corners from the left. Manchester United tried to deliver the majority of the attacking corners to the near post zone, but only one first contact in that area was won: a direct header from Ronaldo. As we can see too is that they have played the corner short to Rashford (1x) and Shaw (2x) – they attempted to deliver the ball into the six-yard box from a different angle.

In the image above you see the attacking corners taken from the right, which is 7 in total. They tried to deliver them to the near post again, with one header on target by Maguire. There is one first contact last to the far post zone, which wasn’t touched anyone and therefore resulted in a goal kick. Two corners were taken short, of which Rashford (2x) was the recipient. He tried to swing the ball into the six-yard box with a more advantage for the incoming runners, which we will discuss later.

Second contact

We have looked at the first contact so far, but let’s have a look at what the second contacts were from corners. Not all corners can be a direct shot on goal, and second contacts can be very important for the attacking corners.

From the left side we see two first contacts that lead to shots – in this I mean this person is the first contact, rather than only the first touch – and we see three shots after a first contact lost, just outside the penalty area. What we can conclude is that Manchester United do lose the first contact in the penalty area quite some bit, but their second contact is won almost the entire time.

From the right side, we see one first contact that leads to a shot – in this I mean this person is the first contact, rather than only the first touch – and we see one shot after a first contact lost, just outside the penalty area. What we can conclude is that Manchester United do lose the first contact in the penalty area quite some bit, but their second contact is won almost the entire time. The ratio between lost-won first contact is a bit more balanced when looking at the right side.

That second ball is very important and can be illustrated by two examples from corners from the left, which you can find below.

These two examples illustrate how Manchester United set up to do something with the second ball. They might lose the initial first contact in the near post area – which is logical, as this is defended the best. They do however react to it by having three men anticipating the second ball and ready to have a shot on target. This is different to many teams, as they only employ one or two people doing that – but even then, they will focus more on the first line of rest defence rather than having a shot on target.

So yes, excellent use of the second ball to maximalise the goalscoring opportunity, but the initial delivery and placement of the corner quick is questionable if you want an impact from the first contact.

Video analysis

For the video analysis, I’m going to focus on routines that Manchester United employed in those five matches against Villareal, Atalanta and Young Boys. Now we have seen how the near post isn’t utilised successfuly and we have seen that shots from second balls lead to chances, but in the examples below I’m going to look at the routines that made sure there were direct shots from a corner kick.

In the video above you Manchester United against Atalanta in the Champions League. The ball is taking from the right by a right-footed player, meaning the ball will swing out from goal towards the penalty spot. Atalanta employs two lines of zonal marking, with a three-player zonal structure in the six-yard box.

We see three players outside the box tasked with dealing with second balls and preparing the first line of rest defence, but as we have seen in the sections above, they also prepare to shoot from the second phase of this attacking corner. There are five players in the penalty area who are Manchester United and four of them (Cavani, Ronaldo, Pogba and Lindelöf) are allowed to roam freely, only Maguire is man-marked in this corner.

As soon as the ball is kicked we see movement from those five players. Where Cavani moves out towards the corner, Pogba inverts into the six-yard box and together with Ronaldo forms a unit that will move towards the goalkeeper zone and near post zone. Lindelöf also moves towards the near post zone. Maguire needs to lose his marker, which he does, and then assumes the position from the penalty spot towards the six-yard box. He manages to get a header because of the movement of other players, the vulnerability of runners against a zonal marking defence and the delivery of the corner.

In the video above you Manchester United against Villarreal in the Champions League. The ball is taking from the left by a left-footed player, meaning the ball will swing out from goal towards the penalty spot. Villarreal employs a two player zonal structure with one man-marker – the one marking Lindelöf here.

We see three players outside the box tasked with dealing with second balls and preparing the first line of rest defence, but as we have seen in the sections above, they also prepare to shoot from the second phase of this attacking corner. We actually see five players in the penalty area again, but they have set up differently. One player is pinned against the six-yard box, while a unit of four makes runs towards that six-yard box. That unit of four consists of Pogba, Ronaldo, McTominay and Varane.

As soon as the ball is kicked we see that 1-4 formation change into a 1-1-3 formation with the rush of Ronaldo being significant in this one. While he accelerates, the three attacking runners still move forward. In the end Ronaldo’s ability to rise above the defenders gives him a chance to convert the header into a goal, but his attempt is too high. Instrumental to Ronaldo’s run is McTominay’s block in the beginning of the routine, wihch gives hum space to run and attack the vulnerability of the zonal marking of Villarreal.

Final thoughts

It’s hard to draw conclusions from a small sample (just 20 corners) and a competition which is so different from a domestic league, but the importance of instant impact is high in the Champions League. In terms of first contacts Manchester United didn’t create much, as you can have seen from the first contacts lost in the near post zone. In terms of second contacts/balls, Manchester United do anticipate well and almost every time win the second ball after a corner – which means they can shoot or build an attack from that possession of the ball.

The quality of chances however and converting them is something to discuss later on in the season, where a bigger sample can be researched and seen if they make the right choices in finishing, but for the Champions League – Manchester United need to work on their direct impact from attacking corners.

ARSENAL’S ATTACKING CORNER EVOLUTION: 2018/2019 – 2021/2022

Huh? Me writing about a club that’s in a top 5 European league? Yes, that’s right. In this article I will dive into Arsenal’s attacking corners from the 2018/2019, 2019/2020, 2020/2021 and the current 2021/2022 season. The objective of this article is to look at how the attacking corners have evolved in routines, and what the effective routines have been during those seasons.

I will be using video and data provided by Wyscout/Instat, which have been retrieved and updated until November 19th. Any attacking corners scored after this data will not be incorporated by me and I will focus on everything that happened before that data.

Season 2018/2019

In the image above you see all the successful corners by Arsenal in the 2018/2019 season. There have been scored 11 goals from 368 attacking corners, which is a success rate of 2,99% during this particular season. 6 goals came from the left, while 5 goals came from the right. goals were scored as a result of direct contact, while 2 goals were the result of a second contact with one 1 goal being the result without a cross happening.

goals were scored in the goalkeeper zone, 1 goal was scored in the near post zone, 5 goals were scored from the 11-meter zone and 2 goals were scored from outside the zones mentioned above.

In the videos below you can see different corners of the same routine which has been successful in this particular season.

Arsenal’s set up:

  • Game vs Chelsea (H)
  • Inswinger
  • vs 4 player zonal structure
  • One player for short option
  • Second player deeper for outswinging cross
  • Two players guarding cleared balls and first line of rest-defence
  • One player in six-yard box
  • Four runners into six-yard box

As soon as the ball is kicked, it goes short and into the second player who is situated deeper in the opposition’s half. At the same time, we see the player in the six-yard box (Lacazette) dropping outside the box and together with the four runners, form a unit of five. Bellerin whips the ball towards the 11-meter zone, where Lacazette controls it and finishes quite brilliantly.

The key to some of these routines is that the 3rd player who isn’t involved, does drag defensive players to him – and therefore space opens up elsewhere.

  • Game vs Manchester United
  • Inswinger
  • vs 2 player zonal structure
  • One player outside six-yard box
  • 3v3 in the 11 meter zone
  • One player short option
  • Two players cleared balls and first line of rest defence

The ball is kicked and swings towards the goalkeeper zone which means that the player for the short option, isn’t used. In the middle we see a 3v3 situation with the nearest player moving towards the near post, dragging his defender with him – creating a 2v2 situation in the middle. Mustafi does well to lose his marker and gets time and space to convert the cross into a goal (although with a stroke of luck).

Season 2019/2020

In the image above you see all the successful corners by Arsenal in the 2019/2020 season. There have been scored 10 goals from 364 attacking corners, which is a success rate of 2,75% during this particular season. 2 goals came from the left, while 8 goals came from the right. 2 goals were scored as a result of direct contact, while 2 goals were the result of a second contact cross.

2 goals were scored in the goalkeeper zone, 4 goals were scored in the near post zone, 4 goals were scored from the 11-meter zone and 0 goals were scored from outside the zones mentioned above.

In the videos below you can see different corners of the same routine which has been successful in this particular season.

  • Game vs Chelsea (H)
  • vs 3 player zonal structure
  • Outswinger
  • One player in six-yard box
  • One player just outisde six-yard box
  • 3v3 in deep central zone
  • Three players outside penalty area for cleared balls and first line of rest-defence

Arsenal has been making use of the second ball in corners and in this particular season, they really did that well. The corner is an outswinger that turns away from the keeper and comes towards the central zones, where the 3v3 is instrumental. Chamber is in that group of 3 runners and moves forward and connects with the ball and sends it to the goalkeeper zone. In that zone is Aubameyang who was the player just outside the six-yard box and who anticipates this header from Chambers, loses his marker, and scores a good headed goal.

  • vs Bourenmouth
  • Inswinger
  • vs two player zonal structure
  • One player in six-yard box
  • One player just outside six-yard box
  • Three late runners into six-yard box

In this corner routine, Arsenal knows to connect directly with the cross and do so as follows. The two players in and around the six-yard box, both move to the near post and open space at the goalkeeper zone for the incoming runners. The unit of three splits, one player goes towards the far post, one player remains his deep position and one player makes a run towards the near post (Luiz) and the latter connects with the ball. Luiz’s header is guided to the far post and converts the cross into a goal for Arsenal.

Season 2020/2021

In the image above you see all the successful corners by Arsenal in the 2020/2021 season. There have been scored 5 goals from 362 attacking corners, which is a success rate of 1,38% during this particular season. 2 goals came from the left, while 3 goals came from the right. 3 goals were scored as a result of direct contact, while 1 goal was the result of a second contact and 1 goal from a second chance cross.

2 goals were scored in the goalkeeper zone, 0 goals were scored in the near post zone, 2 goals were scored from the 11-meter zone and 1 goal was scored from the far post zone.

In this particular season, Arsenal had a different approach to corners and scored significantly less goals from corners. What I will illustrate is that they se deep and late runners, but also make use of packing the six-yard box. In the videos below you can see different corners of the same routine which has been successful in this particular season.

  • Game vs Wolverhampton Wanderers
  • vs 4 player zonal structure
  • One player short option
  • One player deeper for outswinging cross
  • One player against six-yard box
  • Four deep, late runners – 4v4 situation

The ball is kicked and goes to the player deeper who is waiting to give an outswinging cross, while the player for the shorter option goes back into the penalty area. The cross is aimed at the area between the goalkeeper zone and the penalty spot, which makes it ideal for the runners to connect with it. The movement of those four runners and the fact that they are playing against a zonal structure in the central areas, makes it easier for Arsenal to score a goal and Gabriel does exactly that.

  • vs Fulham
  • vs 2 player zonal structure
  • 5 player in six-yard box: 1-2-2 formation
  • Man-marked those 5 players
  • 2 players outside penalty area for cleared balls and first line of rest defence
  • Outswinger

In this situation we see an outswinging corner delivered to the area between the goalkeeper zone and the far post zone, into a packed six-yard box. There are 8 defenders in that six-yard box vs 6 attacking players, and in the end it’s the aerial superiority of Gabriel that makes sure Arsenal wins this corner and scores a goal. Arsenal set up this way that they overload the central zones, and not the posts – hence winning the ball in the goalkeeper zone and converting it.

Season 2021/2022*

In the image above you see all the successful corners by Arsenal in the 2021/2022 season. There’s some discussion whether there have been scored 3 (Instat) or 4 (Wyscout), but it all depends on what you think is the aftermath of a corner or not. For this article we will stick with 3.

There have been scored 3 goals from 93 attacking corners, which is a success rate of 3,23% during this ongoing season season. 2 goals came from the left, while 1 goal came from the right. 3 goals were scored as a result of direct contact, while 0 goals were the result of a second contact or from a second chance cross.

1 goal was scored in the goalkeeper zone, 2 goals were scored in the near post zone, 0 goals were scored from the 11-meter zone and 0 goal was scored from the far post zone.

In this season, Arsenal have equiped themselves with a dedicated set piece coach, and that can be seen in the way they set themselves up in attacking corner, as I will try to illustrate in the videos below.

  • vs Leicester City (A)
  • Inswinger
  • vs 5 player zonal structure + man-markers
  • 4 players in the six-yard box
  • 2 runners (2v2)
  • 2 players outside penalty area for cleared balls and first line of defence.

The ball is kicked and the ball swings into the near post zone, which is zonally marked. To not create too much crowd, the four players in the six-yard box remain their position. This means that the near post is zonally marked and the best way to exploit that is to have runners into that specific area. This is exactly what Arsenal does with White and Gabriel, with the latter connecting good with the ball and guiding it to the far corner, scoring a goal for Arsenal.

  • vs Aston Villa (H)
  • Inswinger
  • vs 3 player zonal structure
  • 4 players in the six-yard box
  • 2v2 – late runners
  • 1 player tasked with cleared balls and first line of rest defence

As soon as the ball is kicked there’s movement in the penalty area. First of all the four players in the six-yard box split into 2 units of 2 players, with Lacazette-Aubameyang going to the far post and Partey-White going to the front post. The two runners (Gabriel-Tomiyasu) move into the central zones/goalkeeper zone. In the end it’s the ball that goes to the near post, where Partey connects with it and scores the goal for Arsenal.

Evolution

*2021/2022 is ongoing

When we look at the bar graph above, we see how many corners have been taken of the last few seasons. The number of corners taken has declined a bit, but overall they remain consistent. What we can say about this is that the given chances of making something of a corner, haven’t dropped and therefore we could give meaning to any changes made in routines.

*2021/2022 is ongoing

In the bar graph above you see two metrics combined: goals scored and success %. It tells us how many goals have been scored per season and what the success rate is if we look at the number of attacking corners taken. What’s interesting to see is that in 2020/2021 season, there were only 5 goals scored and the success rate was 1,38%. We can classify as a bad season, because the number of attacking corners taken remained almost the same.

Having made use of a set piece coach so far, we can see improvement in the numbers. 3 goals were scored (or 4 when you look at Wyscout) in 93 corners so far, which is a success rate of 3,23%. Now the season is long from over and the data will change, but in absolute data – this season is on its way to be a better season from the bad 2020/2021 season for Arsenal.

Final thoughts

It’s premature to jump to conclusions about the ongoing season, as it’s far from over – but giving the trend of the last seasons, it was needed to make a change. The 2020/2021 season was something the club wouldn’t want to emulate, and improvement was needed. Perhaps Arsenal is going back to the old performances in terms of goals, liked they did in 2018/2019 and 2019/2020, but how they do it – has definitely changed.

Arsenal makes use of 3 or more players in the six-yard box and occupy the opposition there, while making use of less runners. These runners do have a bigger chance of success, as the attention goes to the players in the six-yard box and zonal marking will be exploited and utilised by the two runners. If Arsenal keeps going on this trajectory, they could double figures in goals scored from corners – which eventually could lead to deciding games through set pieces.